Most apps tell you how many questions you did. This one tells you what you still cannot do — and hands you the next twenty minutes of work.
The same record is read from very different places. Each desk gets the screen its job actually needs.
Opens it to find out what to do next: the twenty minutes of practice that will move the score, not another undirected question set.
Sees whether the work is happening and whether it is working, without having to interpret a raw score.
Where a centre buys seats in bulk, sees topic-level weakness across a batch and plans revision on evidence.
Every module writes to the same record. Turning one on is a permission change and a form — never a migration, never a second login.
The full module matrixA first full-length attempt that establishes where you actually stand, topic by topic.
Question difficulty follows your accuracy, so practice stays at the edge of what you can do.
Actual past papers, attempted under timed conditions, with the pattern year on year visible.
Accuracy and speed per topic, which is the difference between not knowing and not being fast enough.
Spaced repetition on the topics you got wrong, scheduled before they decay rather than after.
Full-length papers under exam conditions, with percentile against everyone else who sat it.
A projected rank from your mock history, stated with its uncertainty rather than as a promise.
Question sets download, so preparation does not stop when the connection does.
One full-length attempt to establish where you actually stand, rather than where you assume you do.
Adaptive sets aimed at the topics costing marks, at difficulty that matches your current accuracy.
Every wrong answer explained, and the topic added to a revision queue with a date attached.
Spaced revision brings the topic back before it decays, which is when repetition is worth anything.
Four thousand questions attempted tells you nothing on its own. What matters is whether the topics you were weakest on in March are still weak in September.
Two students on 62% can need completely different work. Accuracy and speed are reported separately because the remedy differs.
A topic revised once and never returned to is gone within weeks. The queue schedules the return before that happens, not after a mock exposes it.
No institution, no administrator, no approval. Download it, pick a target exam and a date, and start.
Practise on your own, and link your account if your institute runs TurtleDock — linking is your choice, and reversible.
A centre buys seats for a batch and sees topic-level weakness across it, so revision is planned on evidence.
Every system encodes a view of how the work is done. Here is ours, written down before you pay for it.
| We assume | What it buys you | Where it strains |
|---|---|---|
| The student owns the account | No institution can gate, revoke or read it without the student linking it deliberately. | Institutes wanting mandatory oversight of every student find that linking stays the student’s decision. |
| Weakness is topic-level, not subject-level | Practice is aimed at rotational motion, not at physics, which is where the marks actually are. | Requires enough attempts per topic before the map is reliable — roughly a fortnight of regular practice. |
| Spacing beats volume | A revision queue that returns topics before they decay, rather than more undirected question sets. | Students who prefer marathon sessions to daily practice get less from it than the design assumes. |
If two or more of the right-hand column describe you, it is worth knowing before you subscribe rather than after.
Biology recall against physics problem-solving, with the weakness map separating what you cannot recall from what you cannot finish in time.
Adaptive problem sets and full-length mocks, with accuracy and speed tracked separately because they need different remedies.
Prelims practice with current affairs, and a revision queue sized for a syllabus nobody finishes in one pass.
Full-length mocks at exam frequency, with the queue narrowing to the topics still costing the most marks.
Diagnostic attempts and the first weakness map, usually a fortnight after a result.
Diagnostic tests, sign-up burst
Daily practice and the revision queue doing most of the work, quietly.
Steady evening load, 8–11 pm
Full-length timed papers at increasing frequency, with percentile against the cohort.
Concurrent timed attempts
The queue narrows to the topics still costing marks, and volume gives way to targeting.
Heaviest sustained usage
Almost nothing. The work is done, and the honest thing is to say so.
Near zero, by design
A gap named before you subscribe is a decision. The same gap found in month two is a refund request.
This is a practice and diagnosis product. If you need teaching, it is not a substitute for it.
Explanations are written and attached to questions. There is no tutor at the other end of a chat.
The rank predictor projects from your mock history with its uncertainty stated. Anyone promising a rank is selling something else.
Comparing yourself to classmates daily is not what improves a score. Percentile against the cohort on mocks is enough.
One full-length attempt. Nothing else is worth doing until there is a map to work from.
Adaptive difficulty settles against your actual accuracy, which takes roughly a week of regular practice.
The revision queue starts returning topics on schedule rather than when you happen to remember them.
Enough attempts per topic for the weakness map to be reliable rather than indicative.
Indicative pricing under review — confirm current plans before publishing.
No. ExamEdge is bought by the student directly. If your institute runs TurtleDock you can link the two, but that is your choice and it is reversible.
Yes. Practice sets download for revision, so preparation does not stop when the connection does. Attempts sync when you reconnect.
It projects a rank from your mock history and states the uncertainty alongside it. Treat any product that promises a rank with suspicion.
Four separate products, one platform underneath. A school, a college, a centre and a student never share a record.
What a student counts as, when the count is taken, and what is never billed extra — written down, next to the number.
See ExamEdge pricingOne full-length diagnostic, free, and a weakness map at the end of it. No institution required.