Enter your exam date and the hours you realistically study, and this works out your remaining study hours, splits them across the phases that are left, and shows what has to be true at each checkpoint for the plan to hold.
It plans against the hours you enter. Most candidates overstate these, and a plan built on hours you do not have fails in the first fortnight.
A countdown that only shows days is mild anxiety with a number attached. Days multiplied by the hours you actually study is a budget, and a budget can be allocated.
Sometimes the honest output is that the remaining hours do not cover the remaining syllabus at any reasonable pace. The tool says so rather than producing a schedule that quietly assumes nine-hour days.
That is uncomfortable and it is actionable: drop the lowest-weight topics deliberately, or reconsider the target. Both are better decisions than discovering the shortfall in the last month.
Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.
It depends on your exam and how much of the syllabus you have covered. The useful output is not a target number of hours but whether your remaining hours cover your remaining syllabus at a sustainable pace.
A week or two of revision only, at lower volume. Learning new material in the last fortnight rarely helps and often displaces revision of things you already half-know.
Drop the lowest-weight topics deliberately rather than running out of time on them by accident. A deliberate gap is a strategy; an accidental one is a surprise in the exam hall.
Checked by the Product desk on 1 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.
Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.
See pricingForty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.