TurtleDock
ExamEdge · Feature

The weakness map, and why accuracy and speed are separate

ExamEdge reports accuracy and speed separately for every topic, because they are different problems with different remedies. Being slow needs drilling under time; being inaccurate needs going back to the concept. A single score hides which one you have.

The map needs roughly a fortnight of regular practice per topic before it distinguishes a real weakness from a bad day.

Two candidates scoring 62% can need completely different months of work. One knows the material and runs out of time; the other finishes early and gets things wrong.

Prescribing the wrong remedy to either wastes the month, and a single percentage cannot tell them apart.

Reports
Accuracy and speed, separately, per topic
Reliable after
About a fortnight per topic
Drives
Daily practice and the revision queue
Tracks
Whether a weak topic actually improved
01

The four positions a topic can be in

And what each one means you should do next.

AccuracySpeedWhat it meansWhat to do
HighFastGenuinely solidMaintain through spaced revision only
HighSlowYou know it but cannot afford the timeTimed drilling on this topic specifically
LowFastGuessing, or a systematic misunderstandingReview the wrong answers — usually one recurring error
LowSlowNot learned yetGo back to the concept; practice will not fix it
02

The question that actually matters

Not how many questions you have done. Whether the topics that were weakest in March are still weakest in September.

That comparison is the whole point of tracking anything, and it is the one most practice apps cannot make because they count attempts rather than positions. A candidate who has done four thousand questions and whose weak topics are unchanged has been busy rather than improving.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.

Why separate accuracy from speed?

Because the remedies are opposite. A slow but accurate topic needs timed drilling; an inaccurate one needs going back to the concept. Combining them into one score hides which problem you have.

How long before the weakness map is reliable?

Roughly a fortnight of regular practice, per topic. It needs enough attempts in each topic separately to distinguish a genuine weakness from one bad session.

Does doing more questions improve the map?

It improves confidence in it, up to a point. Beyond that, more questions in a topic you have already measured tell you little — the value is in acting on what it says.

Related

Read next

Provenance

Who checked this, and against what

Accountability

Checked by the Product desk on 1 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.

No call required

Tell us your enrolment, we will tell you the number.

Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.

See pricing

Bring your own structure. We configure it live on the call.

Forty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.