TurtleDock
SchoolDeck · Solution

School ERP for ICSE and ISC schools

SchoolDeck runs a CISCE school on one student record, carrying the ICSE and ISC assessment structure: subject-wise internal assessment, project and practical components with their own weights, and the candidate data the CAREERS portal asks for. Report cards are reproduced in your school’s existing format rather than a generic one.

CISCE portals accept no third-party integration. We hold and export the data; a person at your school still files it.

Written by Checked by Kalyan SundaramLast reviewed

A CISCE school is not a CBSE school with different letterhead. The internal assessment carries more weight and more components, project work is assessed and recorded per subject, and the subject codes and the portal are different.

Software built for one board and configured for the other tends to survive the year and fail in the fortnight that matters, because the fortnight is where the structural differences all surface at once.

Council
CISCE — ICSE at X, ISC at XII
Assessment
Subject-wise internals, project and practical components
Portal data
Candidate fields held in the shape CAREERS asks for
Report cards
Your existing format, versioned per academic year
01

Internal assessment that is actually per subject

The common failure is a system that models internal assessment as one number per student per term. CISCE does not work that way — each subject carries its own components with its own weights, and project work is assessed against a scheme that differs by subject.

  • Components belong to the subject, so a change to the science scheme does not touch the language scheme.
  • The assessor is recorded, because a mark without a name behind it cannot be queried later.
  • Weights are versioned by academic year, so reprinting an earlier year reproduces what was actually issued rather than recomputing it under today’s scheme.
02

Two streams in one building

Many CISCE schools run ICSE to X and then offer both ISC and another stream at XI. That is two assessment structures, two calendars and two sets of report card formats against one roll, one fee ledger and one attendance register.

Because the board sits on the enrolment rather than on the school, the two coexist without a second instance and without a parallel spreadsheet reconciled by hand at results time.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.

Does SchoolDeck support the ISC subject and project structure?

Yes. Components, weights and project schemes are defined per subject and versioned per academic year, which is the structure ISC actually uses rather than a single internal mark per term.

Can it submit to the CISCE CAREERS portal?

No. No third-party software can — the portal does not offer vendor integration. SchoolDeck holds the candidate data in the fields the portal asks for and exports it, so the filing is a check rather than a rebuild.

We are moving from ICSE-only to offering ISC as well. Is that a migration?

No. Adding a stream is configuration: a new assessment structure and report card format against the same roll. Nothing about the existing ICSE data changes.

Related

Read next

Provenance

Who checked this, and against what

Accountability

Checked by the Implementations desk on 7 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.

No call required

Tell us your enrolment, we will tell you the number.

Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.

See pricing

Bring your own structure. We configure it live on the call.

Forty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.