Inventory covers what a school buys and holds — uniforms, books, laboratory consumables, sports equipment, furniture — with issue recorded against a student, a section or a member of staff, so stock is accounted for by who has it rather than only by what remains.
This is school stock. It is not a retail point-of-sale system and it does not do supplier procurement workflows.
A school stock register that only records quantities answers the wrong question. The one being asked at audit is not how many uniforms remain, but which of them were issued, to whom, and whether they were paid for.
A uniform sold to a family posts to that student’s ledger and reduces stock in one action. Books issued to a section are recorded against it. Laboratory equipment issued to a department stays attributable, which is what makes an annual physical count reconcilable rather than an argument.
Furniture, computers and laboratory equipment are asked about with a location and a condition. Tagged and located on the record, that list is produced rather than assembled by walking the building the week before.
Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.
Yes, as their own head, so a family settles one balance and the sale reduces stock in the same action.
Purchases are recorded as stock receipts against a supplier and an expense voucher. Full procurement workflow — tendering, approvals chains — is out of scope.
Yes, with variance against the recorded position and a reason required for each adjustment, which is what an auditor asks for.
Checked by the Implementations desk on 6 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.
Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.
See pricingForty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.