Examination work is a sequence: assessment structure, question paper blueprint, seating and hall tickets, mark entry, moderation, results, report cards. Automating it means each stage reads the previous one’s output rather than a freshly typed sheet — which is where both the fortnight and the errors come from.
Moderation stays a human decision. What is automated is the arithmetic, the seating and the transcription, not the judgement.
The exam cell’s fortnight is not spent setting papers. It is spent collecting mark sheets from twenty subject teachers in twenty formats, consolidating them, discovering three arithmetic errors, and re-issuing four report cards after publication.
Every break is a transcription. Remove the transcriptions and the fortnight becomes a few days, mostly spent on moderation — which is the part that actually needs people.
Marks change after entry. A scheme is revised, a duplicate entry is corrected, a section’s variance is held for review. What separates a defensible exam cell from an indefensible one is not whether marks changed but whether each change carries who made it, when, from what to what, and why.
Reopening a locked component after the window has closed requires a second approver. That rule is unpopular for exactly one week a year and is the reason the school can answer a parent’s query about a re-issued report card two years later.
A report card reprinted in August should show what it showed in March, unless something was corrected — in which case it should show the correction and be identifiable as a revision. Cards are therefore versioned per academic year and per issue, so a reprint is never silently different from the copy the family already has.
Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.
Blueprints, seating plans, hall tickets and results are generated. Question paper generation from a bank is a separate capability; the blueprint here is the structure the paper is written against.
Yes — permissions are per field and per role. A subject teacher enters their component; the exam cell sees the consolidation; moderation is restricted to whoever the school names.
They are components with their own weighting, entered by whoever conducts them. The final calculation applies the school’s scheme rather than an assumed one.
Checked by the Implementations desk on 6 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.
Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.
See pricingForty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.