CampusHub is used by universities with affiliated centres, engineering and medical colleges, autonomous institutions running their own schemes, and arts and science colleges. What differs between them is the examination scheme and the accreditation body, not the underlying record.
The question that decides the implementation is not size. It is who owns the examination scheme — you, or a university you are affiliated to — because that determines whether results are yours to publish or yours to submit.
An affiliated college submits results into a scheme it does not control, and its system has to produce exactly the format the university expects. An autonomous institution owns the scheme and carries the audit obligation that comes with it. A university runs both sides.
These are genuinely different implementations, and mistaking one for the other is the most common reason a higher-education rollout runs long.
Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.
Yes. Affiliated colleges configure the university’s scheme and produce submissions in the format it expects, while keeping their own internal assessment and attendance workflows.
Yes. Centres run their own operations under a shared scheme, so results consolidate at university level without a merge step.
Each one answers a single question outright, then shows the working.
Checked by the Implementations desk on 1 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.
Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.
See pricingForty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.