CampusHub runs multiple campuses or affiliated centres under a shared examination scheme and programme structure while keeping separate operations, fee ledgers and staff per campus. Results and enrolment consolidate at group or university level without an export-and-merge step.
Campuses must share the scheme for consolidation to be meaningful. Genuinely independent institutions with different regulations are better run as separate installations.
The reason multi-campus reporting is usually painful is that each campus keeps its own registers and its own interpretation of the scheme, so consolidation is a reconciliation rather than a sum.
Getting this boundary wrong in either direction causes problems.
| Element | Shared or separate | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Examination scheme | Shared | Consolidated results are meaningless if campuses grade differently |
| Programme structure | Shared | A transfer between campuses should not require re-registration |
| Fee ledger | Separate | Each campus is usually a distinct accounting entity |
| Staff and workload | Separate | Workload is a campus-level obligation, occasionally shared for visiting faculty |
| Student identity | Shared | A student who moves campus keeps one record and one history |
A group running four campuses wants to know which one has a retention problem, which one is collecting late, and whether results differ because of teaching or because of grading. None of those questions can be answered when each campus normalises its own numbers before sending them up.
Sharing the scheme is what makes the comparison honest. It is also the thing campuses most often resist, usually because a difference in grading has been operating quietly for years.
Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.
Yes. Fee structures, ledgers and collection are campus-level, since each campus is usually a distinct accounting entity. Only the academic scheme is shared.
Yes, keeping the same record, credits and history. Because the scheme is shared, a transfer is a change of campus rather than a re-admission.
By configuration. Most groups grant board-level users aggregate views without individual records, which is both sufficient for the decisions they make and a better privacy position.
Checked by the Implementations desk on 1 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.
Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.
See pricingForty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.