CampusHub generates NAAC and NBA accreditation data from live institutional records — enrolment and diversity, faculty qualifications and ratios, student progression and placement, research output entered against faculty, and infrastructure — in the column order the receiving body expects.
It produces the tables. What they show about your institution is your institution’s, and no software improves a score by formatting the data better.
The fortnight before an accreditation submission is a familiar scene: a committee assembling numbers from four departments, three spreadsheets and one person’s memory, discovering that enrolment as counted by the registrar and enrolment as counted by accounts differ by forty.
That gap is not an accreditation problem. It is a data problem that accreditation exposes.
Accreditation asks for data as at particular reference points, often several years back. Data that was never recorded correctly at the time cannot be reconstructed accurately later, which is why the work is front-loaded rather than concentrated before the visit.
Not on the quality of teaching, which is hard to change quickly, but on documentation: data that does not reconcile between criteria, claims without supporting records, and feedback with a response rate too low to mean anything.
Those are all fixable a year out and nearly impossible to fix a month out. The most useful thing a system does here is make the gaps visible early enough to matter.
Phrased the way they arrive, answered so each one stands on its own.
No, and treat any vendor claiming otherwise with suspicion. It generates accurate tables from your records and surfaces gaps early. The grade reflects the institution, not the formatting.
NAAC criteria-wise data and NBA outcome-based tables. Frameworks are revised periodically, so verify the generated output against the current version before submitting.
For any period the system has held your data. Years before go-live can only be as good as the records you migrate, which is worth knowing when planning an implementation ahead of an accreditation cycle.
Checked by the Implementations desk on 1 September 2026. Corrections go in the page, dated, rather than quietly.
Pricing is on the page, in the open, with the counting rule written next to it. Nobody has to book a call to find out what it costs.
See pricingForty minutes with an implementation engineer — your classes, your fee heads, your grading scheme, entered as we go. No slides, no sample school.